« Amazon starts selling MP3s | Main | Do everything you can, doctor »

Paragraph of the day

26 Sep 2007 08:23 am

From The American Scholar:

Brooklyn’s always been the overlooked sibling among the boroughs. Founded several years before New York, it was swiftly relegated to a role as Manhattan’s unglamorous adjunct. First farms and then factories provided its economic basis. Now back-office space does the same. Until recently, Brooklyn was strictly second choice for residence. Beatniks who couldn’t afford Greenwich Village crossed the river in the ’60s, and yuppies who couldn’t afford Soho moved to Park Slope in the ’80s. Now hipsters who can’t afford the East Village have filled every cranny between soon-to-be evicted bodegas and auto-repair shops with cafés sporting lava lamps on the tables and old record albums tacked to the walls. Inside, a horde of latte-swilling sensitives sit in mismatched chairs and tap at laptops and can’t imagine why they’d ever want to cross the river again. They interpret their migration born of economic necessity as a hegira of moral virtue. Self-righteous sour grapes define their attitude to Gotham.

In short, they’re young.

Update Matt Frost adds:

The generational handoff is almost too clean and explicit to believe. Almost overnight, the boomers’ favorite narrative – that of the withholding father who comes, perhaps too late, to appreciate the importance of love for his child and for youth in general – has been supplanted by that of the hyper-literate latchkey child, fending for himself in a world fraught with emotional and even historical portent.

The really fun part about this sea change in kitsch is that you don’t even have to read novels (which I’m told are, like, really long – way longer than blog posts or even Salon articles) to watch it happen. Indie music is full of narrators who sound as if they’ve wandered straight out of the pages of a Brooklyn Book of Wonder themselves.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://meganmcardle.theatlantic.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/17384

Comments (9)

Nice paragraph, if perhaps 5 years late to the party; but "the overlooked sibling among the boroughs"? More overlooked than Queens? Than Staten Island? Brooklyn had its own baseball team for 50 years. I believe it used to call itself the third-largest city in America, back in the '50s. It's the only borough besides Manhattan that was a significant urban establishment in the early 19th century.

I don't often gripe about spelling, but at first I thought "Why abbreviate 'hate' THAT way?" It actually WORKS with the resentment by the young, which is exceeded in my experience only by the resentment of the young by us older fellows.

I expect the writer, who is more graceful in style than in sentiment, is nearer my age than yours.

"Inside, a horde of latte-swilling sensitives sit..."

I'm not going to talk about Brooklyn today, I'm going talk about this quote right here.

This quote had to have been written by somebody who has never had a latte. Every day I try to read a little news, peruse a few blogs... and EVERY time I come across a story that has to do with young people or rich people or white people or young/rich/white people, it HAS to cotain some sort of backhanded swipe against the latte.

Why? Is it because the latte isn't a tasty drink? THAT's NOT TRUE! It's a drink that does everything right! Here's all the latte does... It tastes delicious, it picks you up, and it goes well with pastry. It's a good drink, and it doesn't deserve to be kicked when it's down.

If you have a latte someday, you’ll understand how it feels. But you obviously haven't had a latte. I have.

ok, this is a follow up to the discussion on Ezra and Matt's pages about how DC isn't cool. Brooklyn is a perfect example of a neighborhood that became cool not because of forward thinking public policy, but because it was an economically viable alternative to a nearby cool place that had become too expensive (Brooklyn is to Manhattan as Portland is to Seattle/San Francisco). So, I don't think we can assume that the power to create the next hipster paradise rests solely in the hands of the city council. Sometimes, your town is just next in line (look out East Rutherford!!).

Inside, a horde of latte-swilling sensitives sit in mismatched chairs and tap at laptops and can’t imagine why they’d ever want to cross the river again.

Because the cafe is so damned good.

Brooklyn wasn't always the backwater it is alleged to be in this paragraph. Prior to the consolidation of the 5 boroughs into New York City, Manhattan and Brooklyn were separate cities. The affluent lived in upscale Brooklyn, not among the hurly burly in Manhattan. Hence the Brooklyn Bridge was named thus, because Brooklyn was the prime destination, not Manhattan.

as someone who lives in brooklyn, i can tell you with confidence that the lava lamp assertion is a pile of crap. that is so late 90s coffeeshop boom.

As an historical note....Brooklyn lost its independent status in some measure because it ran out of water before Manhattan did. Brooklyn's water supply came from the areas on Long Island south of the terminal moraine. By the late 1890s the quantity of the water supply was pretty much exhausted, with little opportunity for further expansion, and the quality was failing. Manhattan still had some room to grow its water supply in the Westchester/Putnam County area. So Brooklyn was up against the wall and had little basis for staying independent. After the merger, one of the first steps taken by the enlarged New York City was to petition the New York State legislature for the authority to exploit the waters available in the Catskills,which came on line in 1917 for Manhattan. Brooklyn and Queens didn't get their full access to upstate water until 1937.

buy now online viagra http://magic-pills-swicki.eurekster.com/Buy+Viagra+Online buy viagra online buy prescription viagra

Post a comment

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although The Atlantic does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.


Copyright © 2008 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All rights reserved.