Oil has hit the long-awaited $100 a barrel. This excites television commentators. I don't find it particularly interesting; we would have reached this point years ago, if we had eight fingers.
The fact that oil prices are at a sustained high level is interesting. It is also interesting that so far, this seems to be having little impact on GDP. But the number $100 is not substantially more enlightening than $99.42, the price to which it fell after hitting $100.

It is also interesting that so far, this seems to be having little impact on GDP.
I agree. My hypothesis: The price increase of oil has been able to be absorbed by a combo of:
1) Overall consumer goods remaining inexpensive because of Chinese imports
2) Spending remaining constant supported by people taking on more debt.
Number one represents mostly a one time benefit that will begin to show diminishing returns as the Chinese market matures and labor costs rise. However, this will still take a few years - or as much as a generation - to reveal itself, as it did in Japan, and the U.S. before that.
Number two is where we will probably start to see reckoning much sooner, as debt is going to be markedly more expensive this year, thus people will start cutting back because there will be no more money from any source.
Posted by Kolohe | January 2, 2008 3:23 PM